The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.
If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole.
Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees.
We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. This is the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society.
The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers from our society is the death penalty. As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our justice system is in need of reform. Not only is it committing a crime, but today, it is signing your life over to the gove. I am all for Capital Punishment.
I think that if you kill someone you should be given the death penalty. I think that the death of the killer would give family and friends a bit of ease over the death. Also the death should not be prolonged and should be done immediate. By giving the death penalty to some one it is fair and very just to me. If you kill someone you deserve to die and not stay in. Electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, firing squad, hanging, guillotine, and garroting.
When you hear these words what do you think of? Do you feel frightened? When some hear these words they tend to say, " Oh they deserve it". In the court system that is not always the case. The question you always have to ask yourself is what did the accused do and do they deserve the death penalty? There are five basic reasons that society uses when imposing "punishment" that I've been able to conclude from my readings.
I will discuss these societal concepts and show that the death penalty does not serve to further them. As a result William Smith should not be subject to the death penalty and in fact the same should be abolished from our system of "punishment". Deterrence Deterrence is ba.
The history of crime and punishment in England during the medieval period reveals that infliction of death penalty was commonly practiced for the elimination of criminals.
Henry VIII who reigned in England for over fifty years, was particularly infamous for his brutality towards the condemned prisoners. He used to boil the offenders alive. His daughter Queen Elizabeth who succeeded him, was far mo. It may be reiterated that capital punishment is undoubtedly against the notions of modern rehabilitative processes of treating the offenders.
It does not offer an opportunity to the offender to reform himself. That apart, on account of its irreversible nature, many innocent persons may suffer irredeemable harm if they are wrongly hanged. As a matter of policy, the act of taking another's life s.
The pertinent issue which emerges from the foregoing discussion and the case law is how far the present law relating to capital punishment answers the need of the time and whether its scope needs to be extended, curtailed or it should be abolished altogether. The proper approach to the problem, perhaps will be that capital punishment must be retained for incorrigible and hardened criminals but its.
The history of human civilization reveals that during no period of time death penalty has been discarded as a mode of punishment.
This finds support in the observation made by Sir Henry Maine who stated, "Roman Republic did not abolish death sentence though its non-use was primarily directed by the practice of self-banishment or exile and the procedure of quarrantine.
Available literature on capital punishment in United States testifies that in modern times the sentence of death is being sparingly used in that country.
This, however, does not mean that capital punishment is altogether abolished in United States. The retention of death penalty is still considered to be morally and legally just though it may be rarely carried into practice. The death penalty issue has always been one of the most important issues of the contemporary system of justice. Years ago the majority of the criminals were male over 20, but nowadays the situation has quite changed. Not only grown-ups but also by children who are under 18 years old nowadays commit murders and other terrible crimes.
Ordinarily, a young criminal is not applied the sam. Essay on Safeguards against possibility of Miscarriage of Justice due to irrevocability of Capital Punishment.
The safeguards provided under the law to eliminate any possibility of erroneous judgment regarding award of death sentence which may briefly be stated as follows: An appraisal of the administration of criminal justice of ancient times reveals that death penalty was commonly used in cases of heinous crimes.
However, there was great divergence as to the mode of its execution. The common modes of inflicting death sentence on the offender were fructification, drowning, burning, boiling, beheading, throwing before wild beasts, flaying or skinning off alive, hurl. The analysis that these two present appears to have a definite rational component to it, and the evidence suggests that the death penalty is not a deterrent to commit this type of crime.
In another sample essay on the death penalty , we wrote that the death penalty was a modern tragedy because the deterrence argument does not hold up. Another argument against the use of the death penalty is the high cost that this process has on the taxpayers. One would imagine that a life sentence in prison would be the most expensive punishment that an individual can receive, however the cost of execution is very expensive. A recent study that was released by the Urban Institute found that the cost of the death penalty is alarmingly high.
Further, the study found that the use of the death penalty has taken a great amount of financial resources from the taxpayers over the course of two decades in the sate of Maryland. The study found that Maryland had spent around million dollars in the cost of utilizing the death penalty as a means of punishment Economist. The amount of resources wasted throughout the sentencing process must also be considered when thinking about the continuation of the use of capital punishment.
Through the lengthy appeals process, a person that will ultimately be sentenced to execution can spend years and millions on appealing and refighting their charges to, ultimately, no avail. This problem does not only appear in the death penalty scenarios, but when the stakes are raised and more money is on the table, this issue becomes something to seriously consider.
The wasted money could have easily been spent elsewhere if the death penalty was not still a punishment option for the state, which is especially significant considering the harsh economic time that our nation finds itself in. These are just some examples of how the outlawing of the death penalty can be quite beneficial to a state and the nation as a whole. As one can plainly see, the benefits financially to a state that outlaws the death penalty seem to far outweigh the reasons for keeping this outdated, extreme form of punishment.
There is one last item to consider in the case of allowing or disbanding the death penalty, and that is the trend that the rest of the world is following. As a world leader, the United States has an obligation to set a standard that the rest of the world can aspire towards.
As reported by the Huffington post, the United States is one of only one tenth of the countries of the world that still carries out state executions, and further, the United States is the only Western democracy to still keep this form of punishment Huffington Post. Some of the other nations that still practice the death penalty includes: These are nations that, for the greater part, the United States would not like to be associated with.
However, the United States has drawn lots of criticism over the use of the death penalty. Many of these nations are ruled by a powerful and brutal dictatorship, and the United States would like to really create separation between their form of government and that of our own. By abolishing the death penalty, the United States will join the ranks of the greater part of the civilized world that does not allow the use of this form of punishment.
As a leader of the free world, it is the responsibility of this nation to take a standpoint that shows the rest of the world that this nation has taken a committed stance against the use of one of the most savage form of punishment. This obligation remains to be one of the most important moral issues that faces the nation on a global stage, especially given that capital punishment is included in the constitution for crimes such as treason.
Taking a look at the major reasons for abolishing the death penalty should leave no rational individual in a position where they feel that this type of punishment is still a viable option for the American Justice System.
Modern society has moved away from the days of childish revenge and retaliation tactics and our judicial system should reflect that.
The concept of capital punishment is a prime example of such a punishment. Moreover, the arguments laid out show that the death penalty is not viable by addressing three major areas: Additionally, the attention that the United States receives for allowing this barbaric form of punishment on a world stage is not desirable. The nation is grouped with some of the most brutal dictatorships in the world in terms of allowing and continuing to permit the use of capital punishment on criminals.
Based on these rationales, the United States of America should move to abolish the use of the death penalty from the justice system thereby reinforcing the ideology that humanity has risen to a point where the use of murder to punish murder is not only ill conceived but that it no longer has any place in the world.
Donohue, John, and Justin Wolfers. Tabak, Ronald, and Mark J. Saving Lives and Money.
The Death Penalty - Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners. Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that the death penalty doesn’t really keep crime from happening.
Death penalty is capital punishment wherein a criminal proven guilty of a major crime is sentenced to death by the government. I am against the death penalty and can prove in my essay that abolishing it would be a better choice.
This sample essay on the death penalty gives a series of strong arguments against the continued use of capital punishment: flawed executions and wasted funds are cited/5(16). The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.
Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly appear in essays. Should the death penalty be restored in the UK? The restoration of the death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in the UK because of . An argumentative essay about death penalty. The death penalty is the ultimate punishment. There is no harsher punishment than death itself.