This assumes a patient is aware they are going to die, and in some cases, they must administer the poison themselves. This is also called assisted suicide. Arguments supporting euthanasia usually present the fact that the patient would have no cure, and no way of contributing to society in the state they are in.
They claim humanity cannot help such individuals either: However, the very thought of killing people due to their disabilities seems unnatural ; besides, who is competent and authorized enough to decide whom to kill and whom to let live? The German child Gerhard Kretschmar , whose case is one of the most well-known examples of euthanasia, was born blind, missing limbs, and prone to convulsions.
These children were either starved to death or killed by lethal injection. As the T4 Program continued, handicapped people were killed with gas vans and killing centers, eventually leading to the death of 70, German adults.
The main danger here is that in the scenario of modern society weakening its control over the issue of euthanasia, history can repeat itself and soon it will be up to the government whether or not you are able to contribute to society. People who want to commit suicide—due to despair, disappointment, or for any other reason—seem to be unwilling to make this fearsome step on their own. Thus, they strive to share the responsibility of cutting their lives short in the presence of others, basically with doctors.
But if a person feels they want to die, they should not bring in someone to do it. If suicide is illegal, then why are we helping people commit suicide? The very fact that people call it mercy killing does not mean that it stops to be a murder, since you still take their lives away. Euthanasia is an act of seeming mercy, and should not be allowed legally.
While being justified as humane towards people who suffer and cannot live a full life, it is a murder no better than many others and different only in motives. No person is authorized to decide whether another person should live or die except that person. In the case of an individual deciding to pass away beforehand, no one should help him or her in this deed.
Besides, there exists the danger that governments may take the role of a judge deciding whom to kill, as it has happened in Nazi Germany. The consequences of this could be truly dreadful. A congestive heart failure was treated for diagnostic purposes by an angiogram that triggered a stroke. Violent and painful hiccups, uninterrupted for several days and nights, prevented the ingestion of food. My left side and one of my vocal chords became paralyzed.
Some form of pleurisy set in, and I felt like I was drowning in a sea of slime. In one of my lucid intervals during those days of agony, I asked my physician to discontinue all life-supporting services or show me how to do it. Hook feels as though he was robbed of the peaceful serenity of death and will have to suffer through it once more, when death comes knocking again. Arguments for and against euthanasia are cause for major debate. Proponents and opponents disagree on at least four controversial issues.
The four major issues are, but not limited to, the nature autonomy, the role of beneficence, the distinction between active and passive euthanasia and the public and social implications of legalization.
The nature of autonomy basically means that all people are granted the right to think, feel and act for him or herself. The distinction between passive and active euthanasia, or killing and allowing one to die. Euthanasia is a serious topic because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. Euthanasia is not always applied to terminally patients either. People who have been in serious accidents, or who have debilitating diseases such as severe cases of Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, and Cerebral Vascular Diseases which lead to strokes and heart attacks are often in consideration for the application of euthanasia.
In other words, these patients cannot act or speak for themselves or in addition, respond to much stimulus. Personal experience and opinion may be a factor that weighs heavily on the issue of euthanasia, but the real substance comes from the facts.
The legal ramifications play a major role in the legalization of euthanasia. Euthanasia began with its roots in both the Hippocratic tradition and the Judeo-Christian ethic of sanctity of life, Western medicine has long opposed the practice of physician-assisted suicide.
However, the controversy over euthanasia is not new. Ohio is the only state in the United States of America that does not explicitly prohibit euthanasia by jurisdiction of the federal law. Caleb Dimitrivich, an oncologist, who most directly works with terminally ill patients at St. Doctors have real difficulty dealing with death. The religious community has taken a negative stance on the issue of euthanasia. The majority of Christian religions ban the application of euthanasia to the terminally ill or PVS patients.
After interviewing Maryanne Chapman who is a practicing member of the Catholic faith and who has also worked as a secretary for 15 years at St. Chapman is trying to say is that for patients suffering with a PVS, it is also a sin to try to sustain a life that has no purpose or function in society. You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, thesis or dissertation on Euthanasia argumentative topics at our professional custom essay writing service which provides students with custom papers written by highly qualified academic writers.
High quality and no plagiarism guarantee! Get professional essay writing help at an affordable cost. Order a custom written paper of high quality Professional Writers only.
Free Quote or Order now. Related Articles Essay about Summer Traveling. Almost everyone agrees that summer is the best time for traveling, especially considering the summer break from school.
All countries welcome new visitors and are.
Against Euthanasia. Literally, euthanasia means "good death" but the controversy surrounding it is just the opposite. In active euthanasia the immediate cause of death is not the patients disease but something that is done to the patient to cause his or her death.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Euthanasia or mercy killing is a moral act done out of duty to those in suffering or an act for self-benefit under cover of morality or is it opening door to many illegal issues in the society.
Arguments Against Legalized Euthanasia Essay example Words | 5 Pages Other groups, such as the Hemlock Society, believe that in justified cases (terminally ill) there is an obligation to help, if asked, a dying person to end his of her life. This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Life or death Euthanasia arguments for and against.
Euthanasia is against the intrinsic value and personal dignity. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees the right to life for every individual. It proclaims the fundamental rights of the human person, including respect for his dignity and his value. Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately killing a person to spare him or her from having to deal with more pain and suffering. This is always a controversial issue because of the moral and ethical components that are involved. This paper will discuss the arguments against euthanasia.