Skip Nav

On the Jewish Question

Essay title: Karl Marx

❶Without control over the product, there is no personal connection between the object itself and the worker.

Navigation menu




In parts [16] of the book, Marx again presented his views dissenting from Bauer's on the Jewish question and on political and human emancipation. What is the Bible according to the new German philosophy? In , historian Heinrich von Treitschke published an article "Unsere Aussichten" "Our Prospects" , in which he demanded that the Jews should assimilate to German culture, and described Jewish immigrants as a danger for Germany. This article would stir a controversy, to which the newspaper Sozialdemokrat , edited by Eduard Bernstein , reacted by republishing almost the entire second part of "Zur Judenfrage" in June and July The whole essay was republished in October in the Berliner Volksblatt , then edited by Wilhelm Liebknecht.

In , an English translation by H. Stenning , with the title "On the Jewish Question", appeared in a collection of essays by Marx. Runes intended to show Marx's alleged antisemitism. A manuscript of the essay has not been transmitted. Hyam Maccoby has argued that "On the Jewish Question" is an example of what he considers to be Marx's "early antisemitism ". According to Maccoby, Marx argues in the essay that the modern commercialized world is the triumph of Judaism, a pseudo-religion whose god is money.

Maccoby has suggested that Marx was embarrassed by his Jewish background and used the Jews as a "yardstick of evil". Maccoby writes that in later years, Marx limited what he considers to be antipathy towards Jews to private letters and conversations because of strong public identification with antisemitism by his political enemies both on the left Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Mikhail Bakunin and on the right aristocracy and the Church.

Abram Leon in his book The Jewish Question published [22] examines Jewish history from a materialist outlook. According to Leon, Marx's essay states that one "must not start with religion in order to explain Jewish history; on the contrary: According to Deutscher, Marx's "idea of socialism and of the classless and stateless society" expressed in the essay is as universal as Spinoza's ethics and God.

Shlomo Avineri , [25] while regarding Marx's antisemitism as a well-known fact, points out that Marx's philosophical criticism of Judaism has often overshadowed his forceful support for Jewish emancipation as an immediate political goal. Avineri notes that in Bauer's debates with a number of Jewish contemporary polemicists, Marx entirely endorsed the views of the Jewish writers against Bauer.

He explains that with the fact that while he dislikes Judaism as a religion, he also remains unconvinced by Bauer's view that the Jews should not be emancipated before they abandon Judaism. However, he also clarifies in the letter that his support of the petition is merely tactical, to further his efforts at weakening the Christian state.

Marx was merely applying the theory of alienation, that is, Feuerbach 's theory of 'human nature', to politics and the concrete activity of man, before extending it in large part to political economy in the Manuscripts ".

David McLellan , however, has argued that "On the Jewish Question" must be understood in terms of Marx's debates with Bruno Bauer over the nature of political emancipation in Germany. According to McLellan, Marx used the word "Judentum" in its colloquial sense of "commerce" to argue that Germans suffer, and must be emancipated from, capitalism.

The second half of Marx's essay, McLellan concludes, should be read as "an extended pun at Bauer's expense". According to Greenblatt, "[b]oth writers hope to focus attention upon activity that is seen as at once alien and yet central to the life of the community and to direct against that activity the antisemitic feeling of the audience".

Greenblatt attributes to Marx a "sharp, even hysterical, denial of his religious background". Yoav Peled [32] sees Marx "shifting the debate over Jewish emancipation from the plane of theology In Peled's view, "this was less than a satisfactory response to Bauer, but it enabled Marx to present a powerful case for emancipation while, at the same time, launching his critique of economic alienation". He concludes that "the philosophical advances made by Marx in 'On the Jewish Question' were necessitated by, and integrally related to, his commitment to Jewish emancipation".

Others argue that "On the Jewish Question" is primarily a critique of liberal rights, rather than a criticism of Judaism, and that apparently antisemitic passages such as "Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist" should be read in that context. For sociologist Robert Fine [33] Bauer's essay "echoed the generally prejudicial representation of the Jew as 'merchant' and 'moneyman ' ", whereas "Marx's aim was to defend the right of Jews to full civil and political emancipation that is, to equal civil and political rights alongside all other German citizens".

Fine argues that "[the] line of attack Marx adopts is not to contrast Bauer's crude stereotype of the Jews to the actual situation of Jews in Germany", but "to reveal that Bauer has no inkling of the nature of modern democracy". While sociologist Larry Ray in his reply [34] acknowledges Fine's reading of the essay as an ironic defence of Jewish emancipation, he points out the polyvalence of Marx's language. Ray translates a sentence of "Zur Judenfrage" and interprets it as an assimilationist position "in which there is no room within emancipated humanity for Jews as a separate ethnic or cultural identity", and which advocates "a society where both cultural as well as economic difference is eliminated".

Here Ray sees Marx in a "strand of left thinking that has been unable to address forms of oppression not directly linked to class". The political-scientist Professor Iain Hamphsher-Monk wrote in his textbook: It was a retort to Bruno Bauer, who had argued that Jews should not be granted full civic rights and freedoms unless they were baptised as Christians". Although he claimed to be an atheist, Bruno Bauer viewed Judaism as an inferior civilization.

Jonathan Sacks , Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, regards application of the term "antisemitism" to Marx as an anachronism because when Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question", virtually all major philosophers had expressed similar views, and the word "antisemitism" had not yet been coined, let alone developed a racial component, and little awareness existed of the depths of European prejudice against Jews.

Marx thus simply expressed the commonplace thinking of his era, according to Sacks. The view of nature attained under the domination of private property and money is a real contempt for, and practical debasement of, nature; in the Jewish religion, nature exists, it is true, but it exists only in imagination. Our sovereign and rulers are at the bottom of all usury, thievery, and robbery; they take all created things into possession.

The fish in the water, birds in the air, the products of the soil — all must be theirs Isaiah v. The state abolishes, in its own way, distinctions of birth, social rank, education, occupation, when it declares that birth, social rank, education, occupation, are non-political distinctions, when it proclaims, without regard to these distinctions, that every member of the nation is an equal participant in national sovereignty , when it treats all elements of the real life of the nation from the standpoint of the state.

Nevertheless, the state allows private property, education, occupation, to act in their way — i. Far from abolishing these real distinctions, the state only exists on the presupposition of their existence; it feels itself to be a political state and asserts its universality only in opposition to these elements of its being.

On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that his practical nature is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For similar terms, see Jewish question disambiguation. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Economic determinism Historical determinism Historical materialism Marx's method Philosophy of nature. Adorno Herbert Marcuse C. Marxism vs the Jews in Commentary Magazine.

The Rise and Fall of Socialism. An Inquiry into Conflict and Prejudice. The Anguish of the Jews: Twenty-Three Centuries of Antisemitism. A good deal of the problem is that he has become a major figure in history. As such, he has inspired social movements and individual revolutionaries--some of whom have been faithful to his work, while many more have misused his name and writings.

In the not too distant past, the professor teaching Marx had to deal with the cold war and anti-Communist attitudes that students would bring to class. Not only would these students have many misconceptions of Marx's thought and theory--equating it with the Communist Parties of the old Soviet Union and other totalitarian societies-- many would be actively hostile to learning anything about it. Since the end of the cold war, students are usually not active anti-Communists but they still tend to equate Marx with Communism, thus assuming that his thought has been thoroughly rejected and relegated to the dustbin of history.

In this essay I do not want to deal with the issue of historical Communism. Marx died well before the revolution in Russia. While he inspired many of the revolutionaries, he bears little of the responsibility for the totalitarian regime that emerged to explain the Soviet government, look to the Czarist regimes.

Marx is not Stalin. A related problem with writing about Marx is the multiple roles he played during his lifetime. Marx was a socialist prophet, a social theorist, and a political organizer. As a prophet he forecast the eventual revolution of the working class, the destruction of capitalism, and the establishment of a stateless, socialist society.

Many of his followers admire him deeply, considering his thought an exemplary expression of humanism and compassion for his fellow human beings. Some have characterized him as the "last of the old testament prophets. Not only did he have a belief in the possibility of such a utopia, he considered it inevitable. His belief, of course, bears striking similarities to the Christian belief in the establishment of an earthly paradise though absent the Second Coming. As a political organizer and propagandist Marx wrote to inspire men and women to immediate action rather than thought.

While he wove his prediction and calls to action into his analyses of capitalist society, the revolution and its socialist aftermath are clearly the most speculative parts of his theoretical structure--prophesized perhaps more in hope and faith than in rigorous analysis.

Rejecting this vision of an inevitable and workable socialist society, there is still much of value and use in Marx's analysis of capitalism. But here we will focus almost exclusively on Marx as a social theorist. As a theorist, his writings have had an enormous impact on all of the social sciences. His most significant contribution is in establishing a conflict model of social systems. Rather than conceiving of society as being based on consensus, Marx's theory posits the domination of a powerful class over a subordinate class.

However, this domination is never long uncontested. It is the fundamental antagonism of the classes which produces class struggle that ultimately transforms sociocultural systems. The engine of sociocultural change, according to Marx, is class struggle. Social conflict is at the core of the historical process. A second significant contribution is that Marx locates the origin of social power in the ownership or control of the forces of production also referred to as the means of production.

It was Marx's contention that the production of economic goods--what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is exchanged--has a profound effect on the rest of the society. For Marx, the entire sociocultural system is based on the manner in which men and women relate to one another in their continuous struggle to secure needed resources from nature.

A third contribution to the social sciences lies in Marx's analysis of capitalism and its effects on workers, on capitalists themselves, and on entire sociocultural systems. Capitalism as an historical entity was an emerging and rapidly evolving economic system. Marx brilliantly grasped its origin, structure, and workings.

He then predicted with an astonishing degree of accuracy its immediate evolutionary path. Each of these contributions goes beyond the narrow confines of formal Marxist theory. One need not accept Marx whole cloth in order to integrate his insights into a coherent world-view. Much of his thought is essential in understanding sociocultural systems and thus human behavior.

Mankind's needs for food, shelter, housing, and energy are central in understanding the sociocultural system. This is indeed a historical act, a fundamental condition of all of history Marx. Unless men and women successfully fulfill this act there would be no other.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Karl Marx is known for studying the conflicts that occur between different classes. Karl Marx has introduced some radical ideas and theories to society through his writings. As the industrial revolution moved forward in society, so .

Privacy FAQs

- Karl Marx’s Views on Family Ethics Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Karl Marx devoted much of his time to the study of morality, better known as ethics. Karl Marx was a firm believer in Communism and he authored the Communist Manifesto, along with .

About Our Ads

Karl Marx. Karl Marx: A Brief Introduction. By Frank W. Elwell. Karl Marx () is a difficult theorist to write about. A good deal of the problem is that he has become a major figure in history. Karl Marx and the Conflict Theory Essay Karl Marx and the conflict theory Karl Marx was a socialist who developed a conflict theory about the struggle between the lower class proletariat and the higher class capitalist bourgeoisie of an industrial society.

Cookie Info

Karl Marx, also a philosopher was popularly known for his theories that best explained society, its social structure, as well as the social relationships - Theories of Karl Marx introduction. Karl Marx placed so much emphasis on the economic structure and how it influenced the rest of the social structure from a materialistic point of view. Karl Marx's Estranged Labor In Karl Marx's early writing on "estranged labor" there is a clear and prevailing focus on the plight of the laborer. Marx's writing on estranged labor is an attempt to draw a stark distinction between property owners and workers.