The purpose of NCLB is to ensure that all children have equal access and opportunity at obtaining a high-quality education, while at the same time being proficient in state academic assessments. The NCLB Act contains five principles that schools must abide by in order to meet the standards for qualification.
These principles play an important role in ensuring that all children get the education they need. This paper will discuss the pros and cons of each one of these principles and explore how they affect diverse learners. Principles of the NCLB Act The first principle, strong accountability for results, includes standards schools must follow to make sure each pupil meets the minimum standards set forth by NCLB.
To satisfy the standards, students must meet adequate yearly progress AYP through testing against curricular objectives. When the test scores fall below minimum requirements, the school has two years to make changes and bring scores up.
Testing begins on the third grade, and continues until the eighth grade. Many people, including myself, feel that this standard has pros and unintended cons. We all deserve to have schools in which students are really learning. The second principle, expand flexibility and control, involves the specifics of what makes the NCLB program a success. If after three years they are below NCLB standards, they become eligible to receive tutoring. In the event the student is below NCLB standards for four years, the school steps in to take corrective action.
In my opinion, a con of this principle is that the school should step in before the student is transferred to a new school; there is little good derived from simply transferring to another school if the pupil continues falling behind as a result of having poor basic skills. If the child has basic deficiencies, a tutor should be assigned as early as possible, as recovering lost time becomes more and more difficult. He adds Bush's budget would leave "over 4. In the past, the NCLB focused more on math and English, while ignoring other vital subjects such as history, science and foreign language.
Meaning that when the kids move on to higher levels in their education, they will be not as knowledgeable in those subjects. This upcoming school year, will mark the first year in which students knowledge of science will be tested among certain grades. Another major concern that opponents of NCLB, which include all major teachers' unions, state is that the Act is slacking on improving education in elementary, middle and especially in high schools.
This conclusion came about with the evidence of mixed results in standardized tests. The standardized tests are deeply flawed and biased for many reasons, and the need for teachers to have better qualifications has made the teacher shortage in the country worse.
More testing and tougher tests, tougher and more basics-focused coursed in middle and high school, and also a clearer knowing of college bound and non-college bound students. Even though a good education is necessary now and days, not everyone is interested in continuing on into college. With the schools knowledge of this, they can provide programs geared towards those who choose to mark their own path.
The Bush Administration also made a new controversial proposal making it possible for students at failing schools to receive a voucher to transfer to a private school. Finally the Bush Administration is proposing that public school funds would be used to pay private and religious schools. As of right now the students have two options, either transfer to another school or get tutoring at the schools expense. Since the budget falls short by seven billion dollars, there is no extra money, so the schools have to use their money to fund the programs that Bush promised by passing this Act.
One problem with this is, schools are branded as not being able to have the same opportunities as others. Even though there is all this criticism floating around the NCLB, there is a positive side. With the NCLB in tact, accountability standards are set and measured annually by each state and made available to parents so they too can watch the growth and achievement of their children and their school. Testing results will also be. Nclb This essay Nclb is available for you on Essays
[tags: No Child Left Behind, USA, ] Better Essays words | ( pages) | Preview. A Nation at Risk and No Child Left Behind: Deja Vu for Administrators - Before the No Child Left Behind act came into effect there was a report done in called A Nation At Risk. Within in this report is information and statistics about how academic.
The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes. The NCLB Act, “was designed to improve education and achievement in America’s schools in four clearly defined.
No Child Left Behind essaysIn a perfect world all children would be equal, and they would learn without any reservation throughout their school career, but the world is not perfect and unfortunately our nation's children come from diverse backgrounds that prevent such an equal school environmen. Introduction. This paper researches the history of the causal problems that led to U.S. government policy resulting in the No Child Left Behind Act.
Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on No Child Left Behind. The No Child Left Behind Act of President Bush signed The No Child Left Behind Act in as part of his educational reform plan. The plan includes four key principles: stronger accountability towards schools for performance results; expanded flexibility and local control; expanded options /5(18).